翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Canadian Patrol Frigate Project ・ Canadian Pavilion ・ Canadian Payments Association ・ Canadian Payroll Association ・ Canadian Peace Alliance ・ Canadian National class S 2-8-2 ・ Canadian National Depot ・ Canadian National Exhibition ・ Canadian National Exhibition Association Act ・ Canadian national hockey team ・ Canadian National Hotels ・ Canadian National Magazine Awards ・ Canadian National Pond Hockey Championships ・ Canadian National Railway ・ Canadian National Railway Co v Canada (AG) ・ Canadian National Railway Co v McKercher LLP ・ Canadian National Railway Co v Norsk Pacific Steamship Co ・ Canadian National Road Race Championships ・ Canadian National Scrabble Championship ・ Canadian National Seismograph Network ・ Canadian National Soccer League ・ Canadian national soccer team ・ Canadian National Team ・ Canadian National Time Trial Championships ・ Canadian National Tug no. 5 ・ Canadian National Tug no. 6 ・ Canadian National Vimy Memorial ・ Canadian nationalism ・ Canadian nationality law ・ Canadian Natural Resources Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Canadian National Railway Co v McKercher LLP ： ウィキペディア英語版 Canadian National Railway Co v McKercher LLP ''Canadian National Railway Co v McKercher LLP'' is a significant case of the Supreme Court of Canada that consolidated Canadian jurisprudence on conflicts of interest in the legal profession. ==Background== The Supreme Court of Canada has recast Canadian jurisprudence in recent years concerning professional conflicts of interest in the legal profession. In its 1990 ruling in ''Macdonald Estate v. Martin'', it first addressed the question of confidential information being handled by lawyers. In 2002, the SCC dealt with the question of loyalty, ruling in ''R. v. Neil'' that the question of whether a conflict of interest may exist in how lawyers deal with clients was subject to a bright-line rule, where a lawyer, and by extension a law firm, may not concurrently represent clients adverse in interest without first obtaining their consent. While this was ''obiter'' to the case at hand, in 2007 it became the ''ratio'' for determining the later SCC case of ''Strother v. 3464920 Canada Inc.'' 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Canadian National Railway Co v McKercher LLP」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.